Crystal Structure
of Human POT1 and TPP1 (PDB ID: 5H65) from Homo
sapiens
Created by: Noah
Vogler
The DNA binding complex in Homo sapiens consisting of POT1 and TPP1 (PDB ID: 5H65) is critical in promoting and inhibiting telomere elongation (1). POT1 stands for Protection of Telomeres 1 and TPP1 stands for Tripeptidyl Peptidase 1. Missense mutations of the POT1-TPP1 complex have been found in human cancers that distorts the POT1-TPP1 interaction (2). Therefore, investigating how POT1-TPP1 works may lead to the discovery of drugs that combat cancer. The heterodimer POT1-TPP1 is part of a six-protein complex called a shelterin that has two functions (3,4). Firstly, the shelterin protects the natural chromosome ends from being misidentified as a broken end, which would lead to DNA repair. Secondly the shelterin negatively regulates telomerase by preventing telomerase from binding to the DNA (3). POT1-TPP1 consists of two macromolecules that allow it to work. POT1E, that protects telomeres, is 71442.05 Daltons and consists of 634 residues long. POT1E has an isoelectric point of 6.26. Adrenocortical dysplasia protein homolog (ACD), which is the part of TPP1 that binds to POT1, is 57733.41 Daltons and consitsts of 544 residues long. ACD also has an isoelectric point of 6.29 (5). The secondary structure for POT1E consists of 31% β-sheets and also 23% α-helices, while ACD has 0% β-sheets and 47% α-helices (1).
The POT1-TPP1 prefers
to bind to the 3’ terminus of the chromosome. The binding is dictated primarily
by POT1, as the subunit directly binds to the 3’ end. Alone, POT1 can still
bind to the chromosome, however, the affinity for the chromosome is much lower
(3). It has been shown that the N-terminal half of POT1 has two OB folds that
allows POT1 to recognize telomeric ssDNA sequence. There is an increase in
affinity of 900% when TPP1 is attached to POT1 compared to POT1 individually. When
the POT1-binding recruitment domain (RD) of TPP1 was deleted there was no
increase in the affinity as seen as in the POT1-TPP1 complex. This experiment
suggests that the interaction between POT1 and TPP1 is necessary for the increase
in telomerase activity. It is thought that the TPP1-RD domain binds to the POT1-PBR
in order to target telomeres (4).
Overall, there is
little effect on telomeric length when the entirety of TPP1 is expressed.
However, a deletion of the first 86 amino acids of TPP1 results in the
elongation of the telomere. This data suggests that the first 86 amino acids of
TPP1 serve in a regulatory role. The TPP1-OB fold, consisting of residues 90 to
250, is particularly important to the heterodimer in recruiting telomeres. If
the deletion of TPP1 is carried out further, and the OB fold is deleted, then
the lengthening of the telomerase ceases, suggesting that the OB fold participates
in telomerase recruitment (4).
The POT1-TPP1
protein complex functions as both a negative and positive regulator of telomerase
(4). When POT1-TPP1 covers the 3’ terminus of the G-overhang, the heterodimer
covers up the telomere and prevents telomerase from binding to it. This is an
example of POT1-TPP1 negatively regulating telomerase and preventing
elongation. If, however, the POT1-TPP1 protein is removed from the binding site
then elongation will continue. The mechanism behind the removal of POT1-TPP1 is
not yet known, but it is believed to involve the disruption of the 6-protein
shelterin complex through post-translational modification. Once the length of
the telomere reaches a certain threshold, POT1-TPP1 will again bind to the
G-overhang and inhibit additional telomere elongation (3).
A new target for
anti-cancer drugs is the TEL patch in TPP1. TEL patch stands for “TPP1
Glutamate Leucine patch” and consists of 7 critical residues, Glu-168, Glu-169,
Glu-171, Arg-180, Leu-183, Leu-212, and Glu-215, clustered in a patch on the
surface of the OB fold of TPP1 (6). The TEL patch promotes processivity and
telomerase binding by recruiting telomerase to the telomeres (2,6).
The C-terminus of
POT1, POT1C, contains two domains. In addition to the two OB folds in the
N-terminus half of POT1 there is a third OB fold, OB3, in POT1C as well as a
Holliday junction (2,4). Both the OB3 and Holliday junction domain are
imperative in POT1C binding to TPP1. Crystal structure of the OB-fold reveals a
curving 5-stranded β-barrel at one end of POT1C. From residues 393-538 of
POT1C, POT1C adopts a compact, globular fold with a seven-stranded β-sheet
surrounded by 4 α-helices. A Dali search indicated that this structure closely
resembles archaeal Holliday junction resolvase Hjc, and will be called POT1HJRL.
POT1HJRL will not bind to Holliday junctions since the outer regions
of POT1HJRL are different from Hjc (2).
The POT1C is
important because it prevents the genome from becoming unstable and allowing
tumorigenesis. The short fragment consisting of residues 266-320 in TPP1 is all
that is needed for binding to occur with POT1C. This POT1 binding motif TPP1PBM
contains two α-helices, H1 and H2, and one 310-helix. The H1 helix is from Glu-266 to Cys-278. The surface of the complementary portion of POT1 is hydrophobic and contains a shallow groove formed by a curved β-sheet and helix
αB of the HJRL domain. The Leu-271, Ala-275, Leu-279, and Leu-281 are four hydrophobic residues of H1 that interact with the POT1 groove. Additionally,
the main chain carbonyl and amino groups of TPP1 Thr-280 work closely with the
side chains of Arg-432 and Glu-461 of POT1, respectively, to act as tethers to
stabilize the position of the H1 helix onto POT1. The H2 helix fits into a
depression between the POT1OB3 and POT1HJRL domains,
opposite the zinc ion. There are 4 cysteines that work together to stabilize the zinc ion. At the beginning of the H2 is a Trp-293, which fits into
a hydrophobic pocket formed by the helix-α2 and 310-helix η1 of POT1OB3. Hydrogen bonding among TPP1His-292, TPP1Trp-293, POT1Asp-577,
and POT1Asp-584 stabilizes the configuration even more. There is a
side chain, TPP1Arg-297 that goes into the pocket between POT1OB3
and POT1HJRL, making a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of the
main chain of POT1Val-391. The final interaction in TPP1PBM
to recognize and bind to POT1 is the 310-helix η1. The 310-helix
fits into a hydrophobic groove on the concave side of POT1OB3. The
groove acts as the ssDNA binding site for the OB folds. Residues in TPP1 from
Val-305 – Ser-316 go through the groove perpendicular to β2 and β3 strands of
POT1OB3. TPP1 has both a hydrophobic core and hydrogen bonding
interactions at the edges that enable it to stabilize the TPP1PBM
into the groove of POT1OB3 (2).
Scientists
discovered that the crystal structure of TPP1 was very similar to the structure of the β-subunit of TEBP (telomere end-binding protein) from Oxytricha nova, a protozoan. Upon
further research POT1 was found to be the human homologue to the α-subunit of
TEBP. This finding shows that the capping of the telomeres by a dimer, such as TEBP α-β dimer (PDB ID: 1PA6), is much more evolutionary conserved than
previously expected (1,3). Both TPP1 and TEBP-β use a central region to
interact with the C-terminus of their binding partners. Like in TPP1, the
C-terminus of TEBP-β is not involved in the interaction with POT1 or TEBP-α. The
structure of the OB-fold in TPP1 is most similar to the OB fold in the TEBP-β
subunit from O. nova. Like POT1,
TEBP-α contains three OB folds, with the first two folds serving the purpose of
ssDNA recognition and the third OB fold interacting with TEBP-β. The TEBP-αβ
subunits form a heart-shaped structure, with the telomeric ssDNA in the middle
(2). This is different from the structure of the POT1-TPP1 heterodimer, which
has a V-shaped conformation with POT1OB1-OB2 and TPP1OB
on opposite sides. In H. sapiens, the
chromosomes have the 3’ overhang extend much further than in O. nova, explaining the difference in
structure. The V-shape is useful for binding both the 3’ overhang as well as
the internal single stranded telomeric regions. Another different between
POT1-TPP1 and TEBP-αβ is that while both TEBP-α and POT1C have a third OB-fold
that is used to interact with TEBP-β and TPP1, respectively, the structure of
POT1C is not similar to TEBP-α (2). The similarity in the tertiary structure of
the POT1-TPP1 complex and TEBP-αβ can be seen quantitatively with Dali Server.
Dali Server uses sum-of-pairs method to find proteins with a similar tertiary
structure to the protein in question. Proteins with significant similarities
have a Z-score greater than 2. The Z-score for TEBP-αβ compared to POT1-TPP1 is
14.3, which shows that the two structures are similar (7). PSI-BLAST is a way
to find proteins that have a similar primary structure as the protein query.
Each protein will get an E value, which is calculated by looking at the total
sequence of the protein and assigning gaps (8). The closer the E value is to
zero, the more similar the primary structure of the two proteins are. An E
value less than 0.05 means the protein’s primary structure is significantly
similar to the protein query. An E value for TEBP-αβ was not obtained, however,
given the previous findings, the primary structure is most likely similar to
that of POT1-TPP1. Because the POT1-TPP1 complex regulates the length of telomeres,
studying how the complex works can lead to breakthroughs in cancer research.